DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Citroen C8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C8
MazdaMakeCitroen
3ModelC8
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C8
8,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
210 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
165 HPPower163 HP
210 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C8
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C8
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R18Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C8
4460 mmLength4727 mm
1795 mmWidth1854 mm
1450 mmHeight1752-1856 mm
1220 KgWeight1763 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Citroen C8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…