2014 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (120 Hp) 2014Overall Score63.25/100
2014 Mazda 3 vs 2014 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (125 Hp) 2014Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Ranger
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelRanger
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Ranger
8,9 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
195 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
210 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Ranger
4460 mmLength5359 mm
1795 mmWidth1850 mm
1450 mmHeight1815 mm
1205 KgWeight2048 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Mazda 3 and 2014 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…