DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelFocus
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
8,9 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
195 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
210 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16; 205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
4460 mmLength4556 mm
1795 mmWidth1823 mm
1450 mmHeight1505 mm
1205 KgWeight1471 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2648 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…