DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Chevrolet Tavera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
3ModelTavera
2013Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2190 cc
120 HPPower117 HP
210 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4460 mmLength—
1795 mmWidth—
1450 mmHeight—
1205 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2012 Chevrolet Tavera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…