DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMini
3ModelCountryman
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
181 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower98 HP
145 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R16 92H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4097 mm
1755 mmWidth1789 mm
1470 mmHeight1561 mm
1195 KgWeight1265 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…