DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Skoda Fabia vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 3
SkodaMakeMazda
FabiaModel3
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 3
14,1 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
166 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower105 HP
195 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 3
4000 mmLength4460 mm
1642 mmWidth1755 mm
1498 mmHeight1470 mm
1204 KgWeight1195 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Skoda Fabia and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…