2012 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 CD (116 Hp) 2012Overall Score60.25/100
2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Peugeot 206 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Peugeot
206
Peugeot 206 1.6 (110 Hp) 2012Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 206
MazdaMakePeugeot
3Model206
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 206
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
116 HPPower110 HP
270 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 206
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 206
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 206
4580 mmLength4188 mm
1755 mmWidth1655 mm
1470 mmHeight1452 mm
1240 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2442 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Peugeot 206 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…