DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Honda CR-Z vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda CR-ZSpecificationMazda 3
HondaMakeMazda
CR-ZModel3
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Honda CR-ZSpecificationMazda 3
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
200 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
114 HPPower116 HP
145 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda CR-ZSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda CR-ZSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda CR-ZSpecificationMazda 3
4078 mmLength4580 mm
2013 mmWidth1755 mm
1395 mmHeight1470 mm
1147 KgWeight1240 Kg
2435 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Honda CR-Z and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…