2012 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 CD (116 Hp) 2012Overall Score60.25/100
2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Honda CR-Z Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Honda
CR-Z
Honda CR-Z 1.5 i-VTEC (114Hp) 2012Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationHonda CR-Z
MazdaMakeHonda
3ModelCR-Z
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationHonda CR-Z
11,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
188 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
116 HPPower114 HP
270 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationHonda CR-Z
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationHonda CR-Z
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationHonda CR-Z
4580 mmLength4078 mm
1755 mmWidth2013 mm
1470 mmHeight1395 mm
1240 KgWeight1147 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2435 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Honda CR-Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…