DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda 3 vs 2017 Citroen C-Elysee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
3ModelC-Elysee
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
182 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
100 HPPower99 HP
150 NmTorque254 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16; 215/45 R18Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4470 mmLength4427 mm
1795 mmWidth1748 mm
1465 mmHeight1466-1477 mm
1185-1271 KgWeight1090 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2652 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda 3 and 2017 Citroen C-Elysee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…