DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford EcoSport vs 2017 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
EcoSportModel3
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
160 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
215 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size205/60 R16; 215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4273 mmLength4470 mm
1765 mmWidth1795 mm
1650 mmHeight1465 mm
1372 KgWeight1185-1271 Kg
2519 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford EcoSport and 2017 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…