2015 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.5 SkyActiv-G (100 Hp) 2015Overall Score59.25/100
2015 Mazda 3 vs 2015 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.5 TDCi (95 Hp) 2015Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFord C-Max
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelC-Max
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFord C-Max
10,8 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
182 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
100 HPPower95 HP
150 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFord C-Max
4460 mmLength4379 mm
1795 mmWidth1828 mm
1450 mmHeight1626 mm
1190 KgWeight1403 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Mazda 3 and 2015 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…