2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.5 TDCi (95 Hp) 2015Overall Score58.25/100
2015 Ford C-Max vs 2015 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.5 SkyActiv-G (100 Hp) 2015Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 3
FordMakeMazda
C-MaxModel3
2015Model year2015
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 3
13,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
170 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
270 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 3
4379 mmLength4460 mm
1828 mmWidth1795 mm
1626 mmHeight1450 mm
1403 KgWeight1190 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Ford C-Max and 2015 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…