DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda 3 vs 2006 Peugeot 1007 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 1007
MazdaMakePeugeot
3Model1007
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 1007
14,3 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
169 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
84 HPPower70 HP
122 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 1007
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 1007
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 1007
4420 mmLength3731 mm
1755 mmWidth1826 mm
1465 mmHeight1620 mm
1180 KgWeight1168 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda 3 and 2006 Peugeot 1007 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…