DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Peugeot 1007 vs 2006 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Peugeot 1007SpecificationMazda 3
PeugeotMakeMazda
1007Model3
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Peugeot 1007SpecificationMazda 3
16,7 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
160 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1349 cc
70 HPPower84 HP
160 NmTorque122 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Peugeot 1007SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Peugeot 1007SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Peugeot 1007SpecificationMazda 3
3731 mmLength4420 mm
1826 mmWidth1755 mm
1620 mmHeight1465 mm
1168 KgWeight1180 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Peugeot 1007 and 2006 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…