DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 2 vs 2013 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolkswagen
2ModelCaddy
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
170 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
102 HPPower102 HP
133 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
AutomaticTransmission—
15Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
NoABSYes

Dimensions

3920 mmLength4406 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1475 mmHeight1823 mm
1065 kgWeight1402 Kg
250 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2681 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 2 and 2013 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…