2004 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.6 i 16V (101 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
2004 Mazda 2 vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2004Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
MazdaMakeMitsubishi
2ModelLancer
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
11,4 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
181 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
101 HPPower98 HP
146 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
3925 mmLength4485 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1545 mmHeight1480 mm
1080 KgWeight1360 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda 2 and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…