DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2004 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
Space StarModel2
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
180 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower101 HP
150 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength3925 mm
1715 mmWidth1680 mm
1515 mmHeight1545 mm
1235 KgWeight1080 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2004 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…