DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 2 vs 2013 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V60
MazdaMakeVolvo
2ModelV60
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V60
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
95 HPPower115 HP
205 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V60
DieselFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank67 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V60
3920 mmLength4635 mm
1695 mmWidth1825 mm
1475 mmHeight1484 mm
1025 KgWeight1702 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 2 and 2013 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…