DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo V60 vs 2013 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 2
VolvoMakeMazda
V60Model2
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 2
12,7 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
115 HPPower95 HP
270 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 2
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank43 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 2
4635 mmLength3920 mm
1825 mmWidth1695 mm
1484 mmHeight1475 mm
1702 KgWeight1025 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo V60 and 2013 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…