DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 2 vs 2012 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S60
MazdaMakeVolvo
2ModelS60
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S60
11,5 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
95 HPPower115 HP
205 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S60
DieselFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank67 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S60
3920 mmLength4628 mm
1695 mmWidth1865 mm
1475 mmHeight1484 mm
1025 KgWeight1488 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 2 and 2012 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…