DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 2 vs 2012 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMini
2ModelCountryman
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
175 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower122 HP
205 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank47 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/55 R15Tyre size205/60 R16 92H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3920 mmLength4097 mm
1695 mmWidth1789 mm
1475 mmHeight1561 mm
1025 KgWeight1265 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 2 and 2012 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…