DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 2 vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
MazdaMakeVolvo
2ModelS40
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
10,7 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
102 HPPower100 HP
133 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/45 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S40
3920 mmLength4476 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1475 mmHeight1454 mm
970 KgWeight1311 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 2 and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…