DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Countryman vs 2012 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMazda
CountrymanModel2
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
173 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
98 HPPower102 HP
153 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank43 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16 92HTyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4097 mmLength3920 mm
1789 mmWidth1695 mm
1561 mmHeight1475 mm
1265 KgWeight970 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Countryman and 2012 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…