2010 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.3i (75 Hp) 2010Overall Score50.25/100
2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.3 CDTI (75 Hp) 2010Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
2ModelCombo
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
14,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
168 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
121 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
3900 mmLength4322 mm
1695 mmWidth1684 mm
1545 mmHeight1801 mm
955 KgWeight1278 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2716 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…