DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Fiat Qubo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Qubo
MazdaMakeFiat
2ModelQubo
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Qubo
14,0 s0–100 km/h15,2 s
168 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
121 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Qubo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Qubo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Qubo
3900 mmLength3959 mm
1695 mmWidth1716 mm
1545 mmHeight1735 mm
955 KgWeight1275 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Fiat Qubo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…