2006 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.2 i 16V (75 Hp) 2006Overall Score46.25/100
2006 Mazda 2 vs 2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Chery
Sweet (QQ)
Chery Sweet (QQ) 1.1 i (53 Hp) 2006Overall Score46.5/100
WINNER
Chery Sweet (QQ)
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 2SpecificationChery Sweet (QQ)
MazdaMakeChery
2ModelSweet (QQ)
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 2SpecificationChery Sweet (QQ)
15,1 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
163 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1051 cc
75 HPPower53 HP
110 NmTorque83 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 2SpecificationChery Sweet (QQ)
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 2SpecificationChery Sweet (QQ)
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13; 175/60 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 2SpecificationChery Sweet (QQ)
3925 mmLength3550 mm
1680 mmWidth1508 mm
1545 mmHeight1491 mm
1050 KgWeight850 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Mazda 2 and 2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…