DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2006 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeMazda
Sweet (QQ)Model2
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
140 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
53 HPPower75 HP
83 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3925 mm
1508 mmWidth1680 mm
1491 mmHeight1545 mm
850 KgWeight1050 Kg
—Wheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2006 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…