DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 121 vs 1999 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 121

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

43.25–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
121ModelEscort
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

17,4 s0–100 km/h17,7 s
155 km/hTop speed153 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
105 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,2 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R13 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3828 mmLength4104 mm
1634 mmWidth1691 mm
1330 mmHeight1398 mm
1015 KgWeight1095 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 121 and 1999 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 121 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…