DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Escort vs 2000 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 121

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.25–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
EscortModel121
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

17,7 s0–100 km/h17,4 s
153 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
110 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 TTyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4104 mmLength3828 mm
1691 mmWidth1634 mm
1398 mmHeight1330 mm
1095 KgWeight1015 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Escort and 2000 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 121 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…