DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda 121 vs 2000 Seat Arosa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arosa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.25–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 121SpecificationSeat Arosa
MazdaMakeSeat
121ModelArosa
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 121SpecificationSeat Arosa
17,4 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
155 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1716 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
105 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 121SpecificationSeat Arosa
DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank34 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 121SpecificationSeat Arosa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 121SpecificationSeat Arosa
3828 mmLength3536 mm
1634 mmWidth1639 mm
1330 mmHeight1480 mm
1015 KgWeight955 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2323 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda 121 and 2000 Seat Arosa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…