DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Arosa vs 1999 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arosa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

43.25–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat ArosaSpecificationMazda 121
SeatMakeMazda
ArosaModel121
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Seat ArosaSpecificationMazda 121
16,8 s0–100 km/h17,4 s
157 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1716 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
115 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Seat ArosaSpecificationMazda 121
DieselFuel typeDiesel
34 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Seat ArosaSpecificationMazda 121
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Seat ArosaSpecificationMazda 121
3536 mmLength3828 mm
1639 mmWidth1634 mm
1480 mmHeight1330 mm
955 KgWeight1015 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Arosa and 1999 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…