DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda 121 vs 1998 Kia Retona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 121SpecificationKia Retona
MazdaMakeKia
121ModelRetona
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 121SpecificationKia Retona
17,4 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
155 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
60 HPPower87 HP
105 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 121SpecificationKia Retona
DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 121SpecificationKia Retona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 121SpecificationKia Retona
3828 mmLength4000 mm
1634 mmWidth1745 mm
1330 mmHeight1835 mm
1015 KgWeight1505 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda 121 and 1998 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…