DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Kia Retona vs 1998 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 121
KiaMakeMazda
RetonaModel121
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 121
20,5 s0–100 km/h17,4 s
120 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
87 HPPower60 HP
200 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 121
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 121
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 121
4000 mmLength3828 mm
1745 mmWidth1634 mm
1835 mmHeight1330 mm
1505 KgWeight1015 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Kia Retona and 1998 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…