DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 121 vs 2000 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
121ModelDemio
1996Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
155 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
72 HPPower72 HP
104 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3810 mmLength3815 mm
1655 mmWidth1670 mm
1495 mmHeight1535 mm
815 KgWeight950 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 121 and 2000 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…