DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Demio vs 1996 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
DemioModel121
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,1 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
170 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
72 HPPower72 HP
105 NmTorque104 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank43 lt
7 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3815 mmLength3810 mm
1670 mmWidth1655 mm
1535 mmHeight1495 mm
950 KgWeight815 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Demio and 1996 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…