DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 121 vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 121SpecificationMazda 323
MazdaMakeMazda
121Model323
1996Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda 121SpecificationMazda 323
11,4 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
155 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
72 HPPower73 HP
104 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 121SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 121SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 121SpecificationMazda 323
3810 mmLength4200 mm
1655 mmWidth1705 mm
1495 mmHeight1410 mm
815 KgWeight1070 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 121 and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…