DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 121 vs 2000 Renault 19 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 19

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
MazdaMakeRenault
121Model19
1996Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
13,7 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
150 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
54 HPPower60 HP
97 NmTorque102 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
10 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
3810 mmLength4162 mm
1655 mmWidth1696 mm
1470 mmHeight1412 mm
820 KgWeight965 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2544 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 121 and 2000 Renault 19 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 19 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…