DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault 19 vs 1996 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 19

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault 19SpecificationMazda 121
RenaultMakeMazda
19Model121
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Renault 19SpecificationMazda 121
14,8 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
162 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
60 HPPower54 HP
102 NmTorque97 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Renault 19SpecificationMazda 121
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption10 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault 19SpecificationMazda 121
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Renault 19SpecificationMazda 121
4162 mmLength3810 mm
1696 mmWidth1655 mm
1412 mmHeight1470 mm
965 KgWeight820 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault 19 and 1996 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 19 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…