DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 121 vs 2000 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
121ModelDemio
1996Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
150 km/hTop speed151 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1323 cc
54 HPPower63 HP
97 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank43 lt
10 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/60R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3810 mmLength3815 mm
1655 mmWidth1670 mm
1470 mmHeight1535 mm
820 KgWeight960 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 121 and 2000 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…