1996 • Maruti
800
Maruti 800 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Maruti 800 vs 2000 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Maruti 800SpecificationMazda Scrum
MarutiMakeMazda
800ModelScrum
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Maruti 800SpecificationMazda Scrum
0 km/hTop speed125 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement657 cc
35 HPPower42 HP
56 NmTorque57 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Maruti 800SpecificationMazda Scrum
—Length3295 mm
—Width1395 mm
—Height1870 mm
—Weight780 Kg
—Wheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Maruti 800 and 2000 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…