DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Maruti 800 vs 2000 Maruti Alto Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Maruti Alto

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MarutiMakeMaruti
800ModelAlto
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed140 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement796 cc
35 HPPower45 HP
56 NmTorque61 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank35 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3495 mm
—Width1495 mm
—Height1460 mm
—Weight740 Kg
—Wheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Maruti 800 and 2000 Maruti Alto approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Maruti Alto leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…