DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mahindra Commander vs 2000 Toyota Picnic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Picnic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MahindraMakeToyota
CommanderModelPicnic
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
8Seats6
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,9 s
90 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2523 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
50 HPPower90 HP
145 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4305 mmLength4530 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1740 mmHeight1620 mm
1450 KgWeight1420 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mahindra Commander and 2000 Toyota Picnic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Picnic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…