DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Econoline vs 1999 Lincoln Navigator Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLincoln
EconolineModelNavigator
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeSUV
8Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5408 cc
258 HPPower260 HP
474 NmTorque468 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank114 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption16,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength5202 mm
2014 mmWidth2030 mm
2050 mmHeight1948 mm
—Weight2520 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase3023 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Econoline and 1999 Lincoln Navigator approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…