DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Lincoln MKZ vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln MKZSpecificationMazda 3
LincolnMakeMazda
MKZModel3
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Lincoln MKZSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
141 HPPower120 HP
175 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln MKZSpecificationMazda 3
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln MKZSpecificationMazda 3
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln MKZSpecificationMazda 3
4930 mmLength4460 mm
1864 mmWidth1795 mm
1476 mmHeight1450 mm
1746 KgWeight1205 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Lincoln MKZ and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…