2016 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Lincoln MKZ Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Lincoln
MKZ
Lincoln MKZ 2.0 (188 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationLincoln MKZ
MazdaMakeLincoln
3ModelMKZ
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationLincoln MKZ
8,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
120 HPPower141 HP
210 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationLincoln MKZ
PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
51 ltFuel tank51 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationLincoln MKZ
4460 mmLength4930 mm
1795 mmWidth1864 mm
1450 mmHeight1476 mm
1205 KgWeight1746 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Lincoln MKZ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…