2000 • Lincoln
Mark
Lincoln Mark 5.4 i V8 16V (232 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.75/100
2000 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mercury
Mountaineer
Mercury Mountaineer 4.9 i V8 (218 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Mountaineer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lincoln MarkSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
LincolnMakeMercury
MarkModelMountaineer
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
2Doors5
Performance
Lincoln MarkSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
7,1 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
232 HPPower218 HP
447 NmTorque391 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Lincoln MarkSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank79 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lincoln MarkSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lincoln MarkSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
5265 mmLength4790 mm
1900 mmWidth1875 mm
1360 mmHeight1830 mm
1730 KgWeight1800 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2830 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Lincoln Mark and 2000 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…