DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln Mark vs 1999 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.75–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeLincoln
MarkModelMark
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
232 HPPower232 HP
447 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5265 mmLength5265 mm
1900 mmWidth1900 mm
1360 mmHeight1360 mm
1730 KgWeight1730 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln Mark and 1999 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…