2000 • Lincoln
Mark
Lincoln Mark 5.4 i V8 16V (232 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.75/100
2000 Lincoln Mark vs 1998 Holden Suburban Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Holden
Suburban
Holden Suburban 5.7 i V8 1500 SL 4WD (255 Hp) 1998Overall Score74.75/100
WINNER
Holden Suburban
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
73.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lincoln MarkSpecificationHolden Suburban
LincolnMakeHolden
MarkModelSuburban
2000Model year1998
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats9
2Doors5
Performance
Lincoln MarkSpecificationHolden Suburban
7,1 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5735 cc
232 HPPower255 HP
447 NmTorque330 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Lincoln MarkSpecificationHolden Suburban
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank158 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption18 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lincoln MarkSpecificationHolden Suburban
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lincoln MarkSpecificationHolden Suburban
5265 mmLength5588 mm
1900 mmWidth1956 mm
1360 mmHeight1854 mm
1730 KgWeight2331 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase3340 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Lincoln Mark and 1998 Holden Suburban approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Suburban leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…