DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeFord
MarkModelExplorer
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
232 HPPower213 HP
447 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size225/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5265 mmLength4530 mm
1900 mmWidth1790 mm
1360 mmHeight1800 mm
1730 KgWeight1670 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln Mark and 2000 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…